Introduction: What's in a Name?

Life can best be described as a series of simulations. Within these simulations, mankind experiences a multitude of feelings and emotions, much of which is influenced by one’s stage of awareness. This refers both to one’s psychology, and in effect, reality; a mirror image. When we write, we produce a simulation, when we act, when we pretend, or when we dream, we create simulations. Regardless of the generative action, the mind produces a visual perception that is composed of both brain chemical distribution and our level of understanding, or awareness. All that we perceive is a simulation of an order of processes towards what 19th century philosopher, Hegel, calls “Objective Truth.”

Information that is transferred contains knowledge about the universe, the cosmos, and its lineage (or scientific record); today known as “myths.” What some people describe as ‘reincarnation,’ can also be explained as the passing of intelligence from ancestor to inheritor. This ‘memory’ is actually genetic dna coding.

There is a reason why these observations are often intertwined with religion, or theology. Our biggest challenge is the language barrier and our limited capabilities of expression. Man’s other largest challenge is to remain objective about the information despite the language or medium used to describe it. Should humanity focus on the patterns, rather than words, mankind would have progressed at a much faster rate.

People often dismiss historical accounts of certain technological presences we do not have today. While our path is geared towards digital processes, this does not mean that auditory and electromagnetic technology is inferior. On the contrary, ancestor simulations detail the ability to construct and destruct using sound and Earth’s ley lines. A feat modern government is unable to reproduce.

But technology runs deeper than the project. It is the program itself.

If the ancients created a 3-dimensional scientific experiment, than there must also be other dimensions by which it is currently being observed. We can very well be observing ourselves as both scientist and subject, or AI and human. My theory is that the singularity event is a confirmation that maximum awareness has been reached by both the collective sample and its organizer.